Church made at Charles Darwin | Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution by natural selection

Church made at Charles Darwin

We're sorry we doubted you

Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams
  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger

Archbishop Rowan Williams

Some say the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams is making a monkey of himself with a half-baked apology to Charles Darwin for misunderstanding the author of “Origin of the Species” 126 years after his death.

Nevertheless, that’s just what the Church of England plans to do today – make an act of contrition to the godfather of evolution.

Officials of the church said senior bishops wanted to atone for the vilification heaped on Darwin by their predecessors.

The church is also eager to counter the view that its teaching is incompatible with science and distance itself from fundamentalist Christians, who believe in the biblical account of the creation.

“Charles Darwin, 200 years from your birth [in 1809], the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still, ” says the statement. “But the struggle for your reputation is not over yet, and the problem is not just your religious opponents but those who falsely claim you in support of their own interests.”

The statement is written by the Rev. Dr. Malcolm Brown, the director of mission and public affairs of the Archbishops’ Council, headed by Williams.

Charles Darwin“People, and institutions, make mistakes and Christian people and churches are no exception, ” it continues. “When a big new idea emerges that changes the way people look at the world, it’s easy to feel that every old idea, every certainty, is under attack and then to do battle against the new insights. The Church made that mistake with Galileo’s astronomy and has since realized its error. Some Church people did it again in the 1860s with Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection. So it is important to think again about Darwin’s impact on religious thinking, then and now.”

Before the statement was even officially released it was under attack.

Charles Darwin

Former Conservative Minister Ann Widdecombe, who left the Church of England to become a Roman Catholic, “It’s absolutely ludicrous. Why don’t we have the Italians apologising for Pontius Pilate? ‘We’ve already apologized for slavery and for the Crusades. When is it all going to stop? It’s insane and makes the Church of England look ridiculous.”

Andrew Darwin, a great-great grandson of the eminent scientist, said he was “bemused” by the apology, which seemed “pointless.”

“Why bother?” he said. “When an apology is made after 200 years, it’s not so much to right a wrong, but to make the person or organization making the apology feel better.”




Routledge Sex Theories and the Shaping of Two Moderns: Hemingway and H.D. (Studies in Major Literary Authors)
Book (Routledge)

"Age of Consent" is an arbitrary rule

by all_things_being_equal

Particularly in an age where
sexual-oriented “hot-spots” like gay marriages are changing our perception of what is acceptable in society, will our views on underage sex also need to undergo an overhaul?
Roman Polanski is a case in point. His tryst with a 12 year old girl forced him to flee the U.S. Some thirty years later, the “victim” (now an adult woman) says she has no issue with Polanksi. If the “victim” of the crime is ready to forgive and forget, should we still enforce the punishment? To this day, Polanski chooses to stay out of the U.S. to avoid prosecution.

While we can legislate for the age of consent

by --

It’s virtually impossible to enforce those laws when both parties consent in private. So are we focusing on the symptom rather than the cause? Are we enforcing out-dated moral standards on youth who are living in a completely new world? In an age where sexual-oriented “hot-spots” like gay marriages are changing our perception of what is acceptable in society, will our views on underage sex also need to undergo an overhaul? Roman Polanski is a case in point. His tryst with a 12 year old girl forced him to flee the U.S. Some thirty years later, the “victim” (now an adult woman) says she has no issue with Polanksi

The Polanksi case also raises the question

by PavlovsDong

Of the “victimless” crime. While we can legislate for the age of consent, it’s virtually impossible to enforce those laws when both parties consent in private. So are we focusing on the symptom rather than the cause? Are we enforcing out-dated moral standards on youth who are living in a completely new world? In an age where sexual-oriented “hot-spots” like gay marriages are changing our perception of what is acceptable in society, will our views on underage sex also need to undergo an overhaul?
Roman Polanski is a case in point. His tryst with a 12 year old girl forced him to flee the U

You might also like

Help the Darwin Foundation Help Galapagos  — Huffington Post
Please join us for a special celebration of a half-century of groundbreaking scientific research and conservation by the Charles Darwin Research Station, the oldest, largest, and most successful scientific institution in the Galapagos Islands.

FAQ

Ray Eston Smith Jr
What are the fundamental laws of social morality?

Here's what I think:

First Law. Don't initiate force or fraud. This is absolutely true because people will not voluntarily associate with anyone who coerces or defrauds them. If a group of people don't obey this law, then they aren't voluntarily associated, therefore they are not a society, therefore social morality does not apply to them, anymore than it applies to rocks and trees.


Second Law. There are no other laws, because any other law would violate the first law.

Note: I am distinguishing between social morality, which people…

I don't think there are really any laws of social morality it is just social order.

Few scientists and religious scholars have seriously pondered how science and religion can be reconciled. But times are changing. Not long ago I attended two meetings that brought together scientists, theologians, and religious scholars to discuss just that issue. The first gathering was part of the Science and the Spiritual Quest II program ( sponsored by the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences in Berkeley, California. The other was organized by the American Association for the…

Related Posts